The #1 Notion Startup system, StartOS is $369 $279! [Get Notion]

Logo

Built in Framer.Use the code partner25proyearly to get 3 months free off Framer Pro. [Get Framer]

The #1 Notion Startup system, StartOS is $369 $279! [Get Notion]

Logo

Built in Framer.Use the code partner25proyearly to get 3 months free off Framer Pro. [Get Framer]

The #1 Notion Startup system, StartOS is $369 $279! [Get Notion]

Built in Framer.

Use the code partner25proyearly to get 3 months free off Framer Pro. [Get Framer]

Not too big to fail: Why Giants Die

Not too big to fail: Why Giants Die

The Innovator's Dilemma

Logo of Thinksightful: Counterintuitive ideas from the world's best minds

Thinksightful

Thinksightful

January 11, 2023

A ruined monument, metaphor for a crumbling giant company
A ruined monument, metaphor for a crumbling giant company

The tech landscape is littered with the wreckage of once-dominant companies, their downfalls serving as stark reminders of the unforgiving nature of innovation.

From Blockbuster's VHS empire to Kodak's film monopoly, these giants succumbed to a common foe: disruptive innovation.

But why did they fail to innovate to adapt to the new trends?

The answer is the mysterious Innovator's dilemma.

Entrenched incumbent have shown a tendency against innovation as they feel impregnable. Why fix what is not broken?

If a revenue stream is strong, double down right? Why would you create a disruptive innovation to cannibalize one of your own products?

There are also cases- like Kodak- where the company actually produced the disruptive innovation, but just did not push it to market.

Let's dive deeper into some of the classic stories of disruption.

The Hard Drive Disruption

In the late 20th century, the hard disk drive (HDD) market was a battleground for established players like IBM and Seagate. Their dominance was built on high-capacity, high-performance drives catering to enterprise customers.

However, a quiet revolution was brewing in the form of Solid State Drives (SSDs). Initially dismissed as niche products with limited storage capacity and higher costs, SSDs offered significant advantages like faster boot times, lower power consumption, and superior durability.

While the established players initially saw SSDs as a minor threat, they underestimated the pace of technological advancement.

As SSDs steadily improved in storage capacity and became more affordable, they began to attract a wider audience – individual consumers who valued speed and portability over raw storage space. T

These players, blinded by their focus on the traditional enterprise market and existing customer base, failed to adapt their strategies and missed the window of opportunity to capture this emerging market segment. This allowed nimble competitors like Samsung and SanDisk to seize the initiative and establish themselves as leaders in the SSD market.

A second reason for this was the reduction in form factor of computer, leading to portable devices. These did not need the high amount of storage of the HDDs. The boot speed of SSDs was a huge pull for consumers.

Market trend changes, newer use cases coupled with disruptive innovation killed a lot of the big HDD manufacturers.

Kodak's Missed Chance

The story of Kodak is one of the most iconic cautionary tales in the history of technology.

For decades, the company held a near-monopoly on the photography industry, synonymous with capturing memories through film. However, Kodak's success ultimately became its Achilles' heel.

While they did develop early prototypes of digital cameras in the 1970s, the company leadership was hesitant to fully embrace this technology. They feared that digital cameras would cannibalize their lucrative film business, generating internal resistance and stifling further development.

This fear proved disastrous.

As digital camera technology rapidly matured, offering superior convenience, affordability, and image quality compared to traditional film, consumers began to migrate en masse.

By the time Kodak finally attempted to enter the digital market in a meaningful way, they were already several steps behind nimbler competitors like Sony and Canon. The once-dominant company eventually filed for bankruptcy in 2012, a stark reminder of the consequences of failing to adapt to disruptive innovation.

Lessons Learned

The stories of these fallen giants offer valuable lessons for today's tech leaders:

  • Maintain a Vigilant Eye: Don't become complacent with your current market position. Continuously scan the horizon for emerging technologies, even if they appear insignificant at first. Foster a culture of "future-thinking" within your organization.

  • Embrace Calculated Risks: Adapting to disruption often necessitates venturing outside your comfort zone. Don't be afraid to experiment and take calculated risks, even if it means cannibalizing existing revenue streams in the short term.

  • Prioritize Customer Needs: Understand how disruptive technologies are shaping user preferences and adapt your offerings accordingly. Customer needs should always be at the forefront of your strategy, even if it means changing your core business model.

  • Foster Innovation and Agility: Encourage an environment where diverse ideas and perspectives are valued. This helps avoid tunnel vision and fosters the agility needed to navigate an ever-changing technological landscape.

This is of course, harder said that done.

Disruptive technology can often takes years or decades to be viable at scale. Thus, opportunism needs to be balanced with skepticism to succeed.

The tech landscape is littered with the wreckage of once-dominant companies, their downfalls serving as stark reminders of the unforgiving nature of innovation.

From Blockbuster's VHS empire to Kodak's film monopoly, these giants succumbed to a common foe: disruptive innovation.

But why did they fail to innovate to adapt to the new trends?

The answer is the mysterious Innovator's dilemma.

Entrenched incumbent have shown a tendency against innovation as they feel impregnable. Why fix what is not broken?

If a revenue stream is strong, double down right? Why would you create a disruptive innovation to cannibalize one of your own products?

There are also cases- like Kodak- where the company actually produced the disruptive innovation, but just did not push it to market.

Let's dive deeper into some of the classic stories of disruption.

The Hard Drive Disruption

In the late 20th century, the hard disk drive (HDD) market was a battleground for established players like IBM and Seagate. Their dominance was built on high-capacity, high-performance drives catering to enterprise customers.

However, a quiet revolution was brewing in the form of Solid State Drives (SSDs). Initially dismissed as niche products with limited storage capacity and higher costs, SSDs offered significant advantages like faster boot times, lower power consumption, and superior durability.

While the established players initially saw SSDs as a minor threat, they underestimated the pace of technological advancement.

As SSDs steadily improved in storage capacity and became more affordable, they began to attract a wider audience – individual consumers who valued speed and portability over raw storage space. T

These players, blinded by their focus on the traditional enterprise market and existing customer base, failed to adapt their strategies and missed the window of opportunity to capture this emerging market segment. This allowed nimble competitors like Samsung and SanDisk to seize the initiative and establish themselves as leaders in the SSD market.

A second reason for this was the reduction in form factor of computer, leading to portable devices. These did not need the high amount of storage of the HDDs. The boot speed of SSDs was a huge pull for consumers.

Market trend changes, newer use cases coupled with disruptive innovation killed a lot of the big HDD manufacturers.

Kodak's Missed Chance

The story of Kodak is one of the most iconic cautionary tales in the history of technology.

For decades, the company held a near-monopoly on the photography industry, synonymous with capturing memories through film. However, Kodak's success ultimately became its Achilles' heel.

While they did develop early prototypes of digital cameras in the 1970s, the company leadership was hesitant to fully embrace this technology. They feared that digital cameras would cannibalize their lucrative film business, generating internal resistance and stifling further development.

This fear proved disastrous.

As digital camera technology rapidly matured, offering superior convenience, affordability, and image quality compared to traditional film, consumers began to migrate en masse.

By the time Kodak finally attempted to enter the digital market in a meaningful way, they were already several steps behind nimbler competitors like Sony and Canon. The once-dominant company eventually filed for bankruptcy in 2012, a stark reminder of the consequences of failing to adapt to disruptive innovation.

Lessons Learned

The stories of these fallen giants offer valuable lessons for today's tech leaders:

  • Maintain a Vigilant Eye: Don't become complacent with your current market position. Continuously scan the horizon for emerging technologies, even if they appear insignificant at first. Foster a culture of "future-thinking" within your organization.

  • Embrace Calculated Risks: Adapting to disruption often necessitates venturing outside your comfort zone. Don't be afraid to experiment and take calculated risks, even if it means cannibalizing existing revenue streams in the short term.

  • Prioritize Customer Needs: Understand how disruptive technologies are shaping user preferences and adapt your offerings accordingly. Customer needs should always be at the forefront of your strategy, even if it means changing your core business model.

  • Foster Innovation and Agility: Encourage an environment where diverse ideas and perspectives are valued. This helps avoid tunnel vision and fosters the agility needed to navigate an ever-changing technological landscape.

This is of course, harder said that done.

Disruptive technology can often takes years or decades to be viable at scale. Thus, opportunism needs to be balanced with skepticism to succeed.

The tech landscape is littered with the wreckage of once-dominant companies, their downfalls serving as stark reminders of the unforgiving nature of innovation.

From Blockbuster's VHS empire to Kodak's film monopoly, these giants succumbed to a common foe: disruptive innovation.

But why did they fail to innovate to adapt to the new trends?

The answer is the mysterious Innovator's dilemma.

Entrenched incumbent have shown a tendency against innovation as they feel impregnable. Why fix what is not broken?

If a revenue stream is strong, double down right? Why would you create a disruptive innovation to cannibalize one of your own products?

There are also cases- like Kodak- where the company actually produced the disruptive innovation, but just did not push it to market.

Let's dive deeper into some of the classic stories of disruption.

The Hard Drive Disruption

In the late 20th century, the hard disk drive (HDD) market was a battleground for established players like IBM and Seagate. Their dominance was built on high-capacity, high-performance drives catering to enterprise customers.

However, a quiet revolution was brewing in the form of Solid State Drives (SSDs). Initially dismissed as niche products with limited storage capacity and higher costs, SSDs offered significant advantages like faster boot times, lower power consumption, and superior durability.

While the established players initially saw SSDs as a minor threat, they underestimated the pace of technological advancement.

As SSDs steadily improved in storage capacity and became more affordable, they began to attract a wider audience – individual consumers who valued speed and portability over raw storage space. T

These players, blinded by their focus on the traditional enterprise market and existing customer base, failed to adapt their strategies and missed the window of opportunity to capture this emerging market segment. This allowed nimble competitors like Samsung and SanDisk to seize the initiative and establish themselves as leaders in the SSD market.

A second reason for this was the reduction in form factor of computer, leading to portable devices. These did not need the high amount of storage of the HDDs. The boot speed of SSDs was a huge pull for consumers.

Market trend changes, newer use cases coupled with disruptive innovation killed a lot of the big HDD manufacturers.

Kodak's Missed Chance

The story of Kodak is one of the most iconic cautionary tales in the history of technology.

For decades, the company held a near-monopoly on the photography industry, synonymous with capturing memories through film. However, Kodak's success ultimately became its Achilles' heel.

While they did develop early prototypes of digital cameras in the 1970s, the company leadership was hesitant to fully embrace this technology. They feared that digital cameras would cannibalize their lucrative film business, generating internal resistance and stifling further development.

This fear proved disastrous.

As digital camera technology rapidly matured, offering superior convenience, affordability, and image quality compared to traditional film, consumers began to migrate en masse.

By the time Kodak finally attempted to enter the digital market in a meaningful way, they were already several steps behind nimbler competitors like Sony and Canon. The once-dominant company eventually filed for bankruptcy in 2012, a stark reminder of the consequences of failing to adapt to disruptive innovation.

Lessons Learned

The stories of these fallen giants offer valuable lessons for today's tech leaders:

  • Maintain a Vigilant Eye: Don't become complacent with your current market position. Continuously scan the horizon for emerging technologies, even if they appear insignificant at first. Foster a culture of "future-thinking" within your organization.

  • Embrace Calculated Risks: Adapting to disruption often necessitates venturing outside your comfort zone. Don't be afraid to experiment and take calculated risks, even if it means cannibalizing existing revenue streams in the short term.

  • Prioritize Customer Needs: Understand how disruptive technologies are shaping user preferences and adapt your offerings accordingly. Customer needs should always be at the forefront of your strategy, even if it means changing your core business model.

  • Foster Innovation and Agility: Encourage an environment where diverse ideas and perspectives are valued. This helps avoid tunnel vision and fosters the agility needed to navigate an ever-changing technological landscape.

This is of course, harder said that done.

Disruptive technology can often takes years or decades to be viable at scale. Thus, opportunism needs to be balanced with skepticism to succeed.